Intel will no longer talk about benchmarks

We are establishing Swan’s idea in this solution.

Before we talk about why Intel benchmarks makes this argument, let’s have the discussion itself, which I will formulate as follows: technology coverage can refer to positive use cases (or even transformers) and

The fact is, Swan has a point. I can see five hundred tests showing the relative performance between two laptops, but I can’t judge how well you have personal control over whether the edges of the machine smell your interests or arms when typing. I can tell how light a laptop is, but I can’t know if it is light enough to include that you fire your carpal tunnel if you use it all day. The best. Intel benchmarks have another weakness: they are not lucky enough to have a new system that solves previously troublesome problems. I can tell you that Laptop A has 6 hours of battery life.

In comparison, Laptop B has 12 hours of battery life, but that says nothing about the level of satisfaction you may experience if a four-hour delay hit your flight. You still don ‘t You don’t have to look for a charger in your pocket or fight for space at one of the public charging stations.

There is also a definite satisfaction resulting from the fact that a game or application can run that did poorly before the scores are not always captured. Reviewers tend to compare previous top-end hardware with current best laptops under 2000 dollars and effectively miss the user experience of someone jumping from a GTX 680 or Radeon 7970 to an RTX 2080 or Radeon 5700 XT, for example.

As a hardware reviewer and I agree with Swan and always have. Intel benchmarks do not capture all of the experience of using a product.

For this reason, ratings primarily contain text and not just intel benchmarks. A benchmark-only review would produce more results – I would have more time to do it. The reason we don’t do this is that we use text to convey contextual information that Swan should focus on in the industry.

Also read: Analyze your Motherboard with Simple Steps

 Assess Swan’s claim against Intel’s current competitive position

As crucial as Swan is regarding benchmark limitations. And there is no way to separate his comments from Intel’s current competitive position against AMD. Currently, it’s not that great. This was not a repeat of 2004-05 when Intel took on Prescott and Smithfield. But AMD has taken the overall lead in the CPU market for any use case beyond gaming. And the gap in gaming is quite marginal.

Bob Swan knows this, of course. And which is at least part of why there is a comment on how COVID-19 is a reason to move away from benchmarking. The idea of ​​underlining the benefits and impacts of technology in a work-from-home situation makes sense. Since the WFH is very new to a large group of people. But is best implemented in conjunction with test metrics, rather than instead of them.

I entered tech journalism when the first websites were starting. At that period, there was a tremendous surge of enthusiasm to leave behind the tyranny of the columns. You were no more fighting with duplicate editors to get graphics instead of graphics. No more fighting for every piece of space. Do you want 50 graphics in one story? Put 50 graphics on it.

And we did it.

That did not happen by accident. There was a massive hunger in the market for this type of coverage because technicians and enthusiasts wanted to see more information about the performance of the products they were considering purchasing. Benchmarking is how we catch fraud. Intel benchmarking is how we find thermal problems.Benchmarking is how we discover that one laptop will burn your legs if you try to play with it while someone else is not.

During benchmarking, we learn whether your laptop’s energy-saving mode is working correctly or whether the battery life is an improvement over the system currently in use.

Would you like to know if your smartphone has, slowed down over time or if a new version of Android or iOS is slower? Benchmarking. Do you need to know which system component. Which peripheral device or which device causes high latency in your system during audio processing workloads? Benchmarking.

Benchmarking has its limits. Within these limitations, it is forever nothing less than a titanic force.

The last thing to note is that it is a type of concern about performance reviews is very, very common. Whenever Intel, AMD, or Nvidia lags in performance assessments, we can expect a discussion about whether. The benchmark practices and tests that auditors currently trust capture what they need to capture. Sometimes these changes lead to real and fruitful improvements for overall benchmarking, but they are a common tactic for companies.

Intel undoubtedly wants to reject benchmarks at the moment. Fortunately, it’s not going anywhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top